Sorry Charlie
By: Roy Philpott
I admit it. I made a mistake.
Last year, about this time, on this very same web site and on many sports talk shows around the Palmetto state, I made a mistake.
I made the mistake of thinking Clemson football wouldn’t miss a beat without its greatest signal caller of all time.
So allow myself to clear my conscience for a second by saying, “Sorry Charlie.”
It’s not that I thought you weren’t a great quarterback. That wasn’t it at all. I just didn’t know how good you really were. I don’t think I truly realized what you meant to the program.
Like most Clemson fans, I’ll remember you leading the Tigers to a 4-0 record against South Carolina. In particular, I’ll remember the 63-17 shellacking you put on the Gamecocks in 2003. I’ll also remember the wins over national powers like Florida State, Miami, Tennessee, Colorado and Texas A&M.
I even remember the come-from-behind win in your first start against Duke. Facing a 4th-and-10 in the fourth quarter, with the season on the line, you calmly delivered a quick pass to Airese Currie for a 47-yard touchdown.
Yes, I know your records as well.
You finished his career the holder of 42 different Clemson passing and total offense records, including career passing yardage with 9,656, career completions with 817 and career touchdown passes with 49.
You also finished your career with 25 victories, second in Clemson history, including eight fourth-quarter comebacks.
You took a pounding like I've never seen in the 2002 Tangerine Bowl against Texas Tech yet always kept your composure. You never spread the blame.
But for some reason, I thought Clemson’s offense would be better with a more mobile Will Proctor in the lineup in 2006. I thought the team wouldn’t miss a beat with you out of the lineup.
I thought wrong.
Turns out everybody who thought that was wrong. Your ability to stand in the pocket and deliver the football in the downfield passing game was sorely missed. Your ability to rush for 10 yards on 3rd-and-9 was missed.
And I should have known better because I was there for 99% of your snaps as a starting quarterback. I saw what you did when the offense was clicking on all cylinders.
I also was there to interview you after every great win, not to mention the strange losses.
The one thing I can say, regardless of what happened on the field, you could always be depended on to emerge from the locker room to talk about it.
The incredible win over No. 3 Florida State in 2003? Of course, you eagerly met with the media afterwards.
The thrilling upset over Miami in the Orange Bowl in 2004? You were there.
The “what in the hell happened” loss against Duke a week later? Yes, you were there to talk how the team went from the highest of highs to the lowest of lows in the span of just seven days.
And yes, even after throwing the game-ending interception in the third overtime against Miami in 2005, you didn’t hide from anyone.
Maybe fans expected more from you during three and half years as the starter. I guess I can understand that. At times, it seemed like this program could beat any team in the country. At other times it seemed like it could lose to anybody. And it did.
Maybe that was one of the reasons I thought Clemson would be better last season. Maybe I thought there would be more consistency at quarterback.
After all, reflecting on your career as I write this blog has forced me to revisit the insane wins against the teams I mentioned above. Man, those were incredible days. It also has forced to remember the equally insane losses. Good grief those were some strange games.
But still, let me say one more time, “Sorry Charlie."
You were the best signal caller Clemson has ever had and Clemson football was not better after you left.
I admit it. I made a mistake.Last year, about this time, on this very same web site and on many sports talk shows around the Palmetto state, I made a mistake.
I made the mistake of thinking Clemson football wouldn’t miss a beat without its greatest signal caller of all time.
So allow myself to clear my conscience for a second by saying, “Sorry Charlie.”
It’s not that I thought you weren’t a great quarterback. That wasn’t it at all. I just didn’t know how good you really were. I don’t think I truly realized what you meant to the program.
Like most Clemson fans, I’ll remember you leading the Tigers to a 4-0 record against South Carolina. In particular, I’ll remember the 63-17 shellacking you put on the Gamecocks in 2003. I’ll also remember the wins over national powers like Florida State, Miami, Tennessee, Colorado and Texas A&M.
I even remember the come-from-behind win in your first start against Duke. Facing a 4th-and-10 in the fourth quarter, with the season on the line, you calmly delivered a quick pass to Airese Currie for a 47-yard touchdown.
Yes, I know your records as well.
You finished his career the holder of 42 different Clemson passing and total offense records, including career passing yardage with 9,656, career completions with 817 and career touchdown passes with 49.
You also finished your career with 25 victories, second in Clemson history, including eight fourth-quarter comebacks.
You took a pounding like I've never seen in the 2002 Tangerine Bowl against Texas Tech yet always kept your composure. You never spread the blame.
But for some reason, I thought Clemson’s offense would be better with a more mobile Will Proctor in the lineup in 2006. I thought the team wouldn’t miss a beat with you out of the lineup.
I thought wrong.
Turns out everybody who thought that was wrong. Your ability to stand in the pocket and deliver the football in the downfield passing game was sorely missed. Your ability to rush for 10 yards on 3rd-and-9 was missed.
And I should have known better because I was there for 99% of your snaps as a starting quarterback. I saw what you did when the offense was clicking on all cylinders.
I also was there to interview you after every great win, not to mention the strange losses.
The one thing I can say, regardless of what happened on the field, you could always be depended on to emerge from the locker room to talk about it.
The incredible win over No. 3 Florida State in 2003? Of course, you eagerly met with the media afterwards.
The thrilling upset over Miami in the Orange Bowl in 2004? You were there.
The “what in the hell happened” loss against Duke a week later? Yes, you were there to talk how the team went from the highest of highs to the lowest of lows in the span of just seven days.
And yes, even after throwing the game-ending interception in the third overtime against Miami in 2005, you didn’t hide from anyone.
Maybe fans expected more from you during three and half years as the starter. I guess I can understand that. At times, it seemed like this program could beat any team in the country. At other times it seemed like it could lose to anybody. And it did.
Maybe that was one of the reasons I thought Clemson would be better last season. Maybe I thought there would be more consistency at quarterback.
After all, reflecting on your career as I write this blog has forced me to revisit the insane wins against the teams I mentioned above. Man, those were incredible days. It also has forced to remember the equally insane losses. Good grief those were some strange games.
But still, let me say one more time, “Sorry Charlie."
You were the best signal caller Clemson has ever had and Clemson football was not better after you left.



19 Comments:
Wow, good work Roy. It's nice to hear Charlie get the praise he deserves. Thanks for a good read.
You are kind of over reacting a little.
I am not sure if Charlie was the best QB ever at Clemson, but as the past season unfolded, it became clear to me that a healthy Charlie could have made quite a difference in the season. As time goes by, I think Charlie will be appreciated more and more.
We might have gone undefeated or with one loss with him last year. We certainly would have had won the ACC...
Quote "I made the mistake of thinking Clemson football wouldn’t miss a beat without its greatest signal caller of all time."
Come on Roy. CW was good, but the greatest of all time. Not even close.
Fair enough Delky. Tell me who was better and why.
Well, I can definately say, the Tigers will be alot better without Proctor behind center this year. I don't know what I would do if I had to watch him throw another underthrown ball. Whitehurst was good and Ron never said he was the best QB at Clemson, just the best signal caller.
Steve Fuller for one. And Homer Jordan because he knew how to win the big game. CW never won a championship of any kind at CU. But he was still a very good QB and I thank him for his efforts.
Whitehurst was the best in terms of skills, he just never had as good a team as Homer Jordan or Steve Fuller. You can't fault him for that. He had the best pocket presence. He had the best skills, just not the best talent nor offensive playcalling (2004) around him IMO.
I will give CW a big pass one the play calling. Didn't he have 4 different OCs in 4 years?
I would also take Rodney Williams over CW... snake
i'll man up and agree with Roy. Charlie was the best pure QB in Clemson history and had he been in the right system on a big time program he would have been a first rounder easily. I feel bad for Proctor following a legend like Charlie, and i hope Willy can achieve the same things Charlie did but on a greater stage and i think he can.
Charlie was the best and when we go thru this season scracthing our head regarding our QB situation, you will see why.
At least Roy realized it.
Well Roy Boy Toy, Its good to hear you admit to being wrong about something.... You should do it more often....
Charlie was one of the best we ever had and with his total wins i would argue he was the best pure QB we ever had. All of his skills and his knowledge he was truly a great QB. It was not more revealing then last year when it fell completely apart at the QB position. He will be missed until we find another talent just like Charlie. IMO.
I agree with you Roy, Sorry Charlie i was foolish enough too believe that we wouldn't miss a beat at QB but i was EXTREMELY wrong!!!
I hope he gets more chances to start next year in the pros. He had a rushing TD last year, does anyone know how he got it? Botched special teams play or scrambling?
Charlie is my favorite quarterback of all times and i've always stood up for him when everyone was saying how much better Will would be at quarterback. It's good to finally hear somebody other than myself say that Charlie was awesome. It's also good to give Charlie the credit that he deserves.
I think people didn't realize how good Charlie was because of expectations. He had all the talent in the world and just never seemed to put it all together. He was hyped as a Heisman hopeful before his junior year and had one of the worst seasons of any QB in the country. His head just never seemed to be consistently in the big games either.
And BTW, two words for you as to who was better than CW, or at least better at the end of his career and somebody who improved as opposed to backtracking like CW: Woodrow Dantzler.
I'd take Woody Dantzler over Whitehurst, any day. Dantzler was scary as a scrambling dual threat QB. I don't recall CW having much mobility. On the other hand, the NFL seems to favor Whitehurst. Then again, the NFL requires taller QBs than college. Could Ali have beaten Tyson? Whatever.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home